top of page
Search
    • Oct 4, 2013
    • 1 min read

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Sustains Opposition to CLOROTEC Mark and Design

On September 26, 2013, the TTAB issued a precedential decision sustaining opposition to the registration of the CLOROTEC mark and design due to the applicant’s admitted non-use of the mark in the United States (108 USPQ2d 1063 (TTAB 2013)). This decision came in response to a motion for summary judgment filed by Jeff on behalf of The Clorox Company. In addition to this matter, Jeff has represented both trademark applicants and opposers in several inter partes proceedings in the TTAB.


The decision is available here: Order Granting Summary Judgment on Non-Use.


The decision is also the subject of a posting on the TTABlog.

Recent Posts

See All

Marty Glick today joined Skaggs Faucette as our newest partner. Marty previously practiced law at Howard Rice and its successor firm Arnold & Porter for more than 40 years. Jason and Jeff both worke

Jeff is now a member of the Alternative Dispute Resolution panel for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Jeff is available to serve as a mediator or early neutra

Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in Cochrane v. Open Text Corp., Case No. 15-16322, affirming the district court’s judgment confirming Kevin Cochrane’s ar

bottom of page